Controversial Gay-Parenting Study Is Severely Flawed, Journal’s Audit Finds
July 26, 2012 – The Chronicle, Percolator
By Tom Bartlett
The peer-review process failed to identify significant, disqualifying problems with a controversial and widely publicized study that seemed to raise doubts about the parenting abilities of gay couples, according to an internal audit scheduled to appear in the November issue of the journal, Social Science Research,that published the study.
The highly critical audit, a draft of which was provided to The Chronicle by the journal’s editor, also cites conflicts of interest among the reviewers, and states that “scholars who should have known better failed to recuse themselves from the review process.”
Since it was published last month, the study, titled “How Different Are the Adult Children of Parents Who Have Same-Sex Relationships?,” has been the subject of numerous news articles and blog posts. It has been used by opponents of same-sex marriage to make their case, and it’s been blasted by gay-rights activists as flawed and biased.
The study’s author, Mark Regnerus, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Texas at Austin, even made the cover of The Weekly Standard. In the illustration, he is strapped to a Catherine wheel that’s being tended by masked torturers.
Click here to read the entire article.
Latest posts by Anthony Brown (see all)
- Fertility Fraud: The U.S. Is Experiencing An Explosion Of Legislation. And That’s A Good Thing - February 16, 2020
- Paying gestational carriers should be legal in all states - February 16, 2020
- Putin says he won’t allow for LGBTQ families or marriages in Russia - February 16, 2020