Revolutionary test could make IVF more successful by looking at the DNA a fertilised egg sheds in the lab
A revolutionary DNA test could make IVF more successful, research suggests.
Problems with a developing baby’s chromosomes – strands of DNA found in every cell – are thought to be the main cause of miscarriages.
To maximise a woman’s chance of conceiving via IVF, embryos are therefore screened before they are implanted into her womb to check for any chromosomal issues.
But this involves taking cells from the embryos, which can damage them and increase the risk of a miscarriage.
The research was carried out by Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and led by Dr Catherine Racowsky, professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology.
IVF involves taking a woman’s eggs, which then get mixed with her partner’s, or a donor’s, sperm in a lab. After 16-to-20 hours, they are checked to see if the egg has been fertilised.
The fertilised eggs – or embryos – grow in the lab for six days before the best one or two are transferred into the womb.
But this can do more harm than good and therefore only tends to be carried out when older women – who are more at risk of chromosomal abnormalities – are undergoing IVF.
To test whether a safer approach is possible, the researchers analysed 52 embryos from IVF clinics that were no longer needed and had already undergone a biopsy.
These embryos were kept in a petri dish for 24 hours.
The scientists then tested 0.01ml of the surrounding fluid in the dish, as well as the embryos themselves to determine how many chromosomes they contained.
Results – presented at the Fertility 2019 conference in Birmingham – suggested analysing this fluid produced fewer false positives than traditional methods.
A false positive occurs when a test indicates a problem when the embryo is in fact healthy.
‘This shows DNA in spent culture medium can be reliably amplified and sequenced,’ Dr Catherine Racowsky said at the conference.
And the new method does not harm the embryo.
Virginia Bolton, consultant embryologist at St Guy’s Hospital – who was not involved in the research – told New Scientist: ‘Trying to refine our mechanisms for choosing the embryo that’s most likely to lead to pregnancy is something that’s been eluding us for ever.
‘This [approach] doesn’t damage the embryo in any way.’
Dr Bolton believes this technique is better than others being developed that test for the chemicals an embryo secretes.
She worries these chemicals may become diluted, skewing the results, whereas ‘the DNA is either there or it isn’t’, she said.
February 13, 2019, thedailymail.co.uk, by Alexandra Thompson
Click here to read the entire article.
Latest posts by Anthony Brown (see all)
- Gay married couple sues after daughter denied U.S. citizenship - September 12, 2019
- Gay fathers study shows they receive less parental leave than other couples - September 7, 2019
- The unintended consequences of Canada surrogacy law changes (Opinion) - September 7, 2019